|
|
Post by mringgenberg on Jun 2, 2015 16:42:44 GMT -5
Lower
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 2, 2015 22:31:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mringgenberg on Jun 2, 2015 22:32:05 GMT -5
Higher
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 4, 2015 9:05:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mringgenberg on Jun 4, 2015 9:15:21 GMT -5
Lower
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 5, 2015 9:56:42 GMT -5
If it's lower, you win the first game of the match. If not, Greg wins the first round. Is it lower? [DING-DING-DING, APPLAUSE]It's a trip to Toronto! If you win this game, or the second round, the trip is yours. Julianne will place the trip in your prize column while Rumer hands me a replacement card. Want to try it again, Matt? |
|
|
|
Post by mringgenberg on Jun 5, 2015 16:44:16 GMT -5
Yes. Lower
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 5, 2015 21:16:49 GMT -5
For the first round of the match, is it lower...? [BUZZER, AUDIENCE GROANS]No... and that means Greg wins round 1! [WINNING BELL SOUNDS, WIN CUE 1, CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]
And Greg... not only you've won $500 for winning round 1, but also won this prize. Bob...? [MATCH GAME/HOLLYWOOD SQUARES HOUR COMMERCIAL CUE THEME]Bob Hilton: Greg, you have won a treadmill![CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]This Incline Trainer treadmill from NordicTrack has an adjustable incline and a 10-inch screen for web browsing or customizing your workouts! A terrific prize worth $1,999. Congratulations, Greg![CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]Tony: Congrats on winning the treadmill, Greg. If you win one more round, you'll be playing the Money Cards. Matt... you'll still have lots of time to tie up the match. And while Rumer & Julianne deal a new set of cards, we'll pause immediately for a commercial. Back with more of Card Sharks right after we do a little business for America. Stick around, folks... we'll be right back. [COMMERCIAL CUE, CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]*fade to commercial* |
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 6, 2015 9:37:11 GMT -5
*fade to logo* Bob Hilton: Closed Captioning sponsored today by the following--============================================================================================================================ *back to studio* [CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]Welcome back to Card Sharks. At the end of round 1, our champion Greg have won the game, $500, and a treadmill. Matt will try his luck and win the second round. And during the commercial break, our guest models Julianne Hough and "Dancing with the Stars" winner Rumer Willis have dealt a new set of cards for our participants. Let's begin round 2 with our first question. *grabs card* Greg... we've asked 100 Americans: Do you think it's wrong for the US Government to drill for oil on sacred Native American sites?How many of them say it is wrong to drill oil on sacred Native American sites? |
|
|
|
Post by palmer7 on Jun 6, 2015 9:52:43 GMT -5
Well, I'm part Indian, not enough to matter. Do I think it's wrong? Yes. Haven't we moved the Indians around enough? Haven't we? If we keep moving them around, we're gonna create a modern-day Custer's Last Stand, if the courts don't get to them first. I'm going to say that's a high number, about 65.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 6, 2015 10:27:43 GMT -5
[DING]65 out of 100 say it's wrong for the US Government to drill for oil on sacred Native American sites. What do you think, Matt... higher or lower?
|
|
|
|
Post by mringgenberg on Jun 6, 2015 16:44:47 GMT -5
I agree with Greg on it being wrong to drill on Native American sites so I'm going to say that it's a little higher.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 6, 2015 17:49:57 GMT -5
[DING][APPLAUSE]The audience most definitely approves your answer. Let's see if you and the audience are right. Greg says 65 and Matt says it's higher. The actual number of Americans say it's wrong for the US Government to drill for oil on sacred Native American sites is-- [DING-DING-DING, APPLAUSE]94. Matt's right... it is higher. Just for that, you'll begin the second round starting with-- --a 4.
|
|
|
|
Post by mringgenberg on Jun 6, 2015 18:01:50 GMT -5
Higher
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 7, 2015 0:19:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mringgenberg on Jun 7, 2015 0:31:24 GMT -5
Higher
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 7, 2015 11:24:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mringgenberg on Jun 7, 2015 12:31:46 GMT -5
Freeze
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 7, 2015 16:52:35 GMT -5
And we'll move the freeze bar for Matt. Just two more cards from a tie game. *grabs card* Matt... here is an Educated Guess question. Formerly known as Bruce, Caitlyn Jenner have graced the cover of Vanity Fair. "The magazine tweeted the photo with the tagline 'Call Me Caitlyn,' featuring the former Olympian posing..." At the time of this presentation (posting), how many retweets have been added for VF's cover of the newly Miss Jenner? |
|
|
|
Post by mringgenberg on Jun 7, 2015 16:56:10 GMT -5
550
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 7, 2015 17:11:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mringgenberg on Jun 7, 2015 17:14:54 GMT -5
I remember seeing the cover but I really don't follow Twitter so I'm going to say 550.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 7, 2015 18:50:46 GMT -5
[DING]550 of them have retweed the Vanity Fair cover of Caitlyn Jenner. What say you, Greg... higher or lower?
|
|
|
|
Post by palmer7 on Jun 7, 2015 19:57:55 GMT -5
Well, there's a lot of hullabaloo about this whole Caitlyn thing. She'll always be Bruce to me. I'm going to say higher.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 7, 2015 22:42:56 GMT -5
[DING]If I were a betting man, I would say it's way much higher. Let's see if you're right. Matt says 550 retweets and Greg says it's higher... The actual number of reteeets of the Vanity Fair cover of Caitlyn Jenner is-- [DING-DING-DING, APPLAUSE]33,215. Greg's right... it's way much higher. Champion gets his turn starting with his base card... ...a 5. Play or change, Greg?
|
|
|
|
Post by palmer7 on Jun 7, 2015 22:46:18 GMT -5
Higher.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 8, 2015 10:57:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by palmer7 on Jun 8, 2015 11:16:59 GMT -5
Lower.
|
|
|
|
Post by tmann3x on Jun 9, 2015 19:43:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by palmer7 on Jun 9, 2015 21:00:32 GMT -5
Freeze.
|
|
