|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 6, 2016 15:59:25 GMT -5
Can't really be higher so lower than an Ace?  |
|
|
|
Post by billmcdee on Jun 6, 2016 16:44:46 GMT -5
Lower than that lovely lady please!
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 7, 2016 15:49:31 GMT -5
Lower than the Queen for the first game?..  Yes! [Producing a bundle of £10 notes] And as promised for winning the game, £1,000 in cash! We move straight on with the 2nd game, and we start with you this time Bill. We asked 100 single mothers: If you could afford a harem of handsome men, would you want it? How many single mothers said yes, they would have a male harem if they could afford it? |
|
|
|
Post by billmcdee on Jun 8, 2016 4:03:03 GMT -5
If you had said single women, I would tend to think a higher number, but this is single mothers we are talking about, and any mother worth her salt would not want to raise her child or children around that kind of environment. I'm hoping it's an extremely low number, maybe 8.
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 9, 2016 16:39:27 GMT -5
[??]
[8]
Bill says 8 James, what do you reckon?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2016 20:23:15 GMT -5
I would say ifs a little bit higher.
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 10, 2016 3:22:02 GMT -5
Higher you say, and the number of single mothers who said they would have a harem of men if they could afford it is:*[HIGHER]
*27
[8]
Some people stop at NOTHING! Alright James, you have control of the cards, and for your sake we hope it's a good card to start off with:
[Applause and general audience approval]
Can't really beat it, I assume you don't want to change it, what'll it be?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 8:27:09 GMT -5
You're sang right I don't! Lower!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 8:28:08 GMT -5
(I will be going away later today. I will be back Sunday)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2016 15:03:55 GMT -5
Back!
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 13, 2016 13:40:06 GMT -5
Lower than an Ace?..  A four! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2016 13:41:12 GMT -5
Higher!
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 15, 2016 7:30:06 GMT -5
Higher than 4 you say..  And now it's decision time, a middle card. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2016 9:52:10 GMT -5
Freeze!
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 17, 2016 6:02:17 GMT -5
And with that James freezes and gets first crack at the second question:
We asked 100 married pension-aged women: Do you still have a piece of cake from your wedding? How many said that they did?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2016 10:42:21 GMT -5
Whew! That is a pretty low number. It probsbly got bad by then or if they remarried recently they could still have it and it would be good. But it's a pretty low number I would say about 15
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 19, 2016 9:50:43 GMT -5
And we put 15 on the board, Bill, what do you think?
|
|
|
|
Post by billmcdee on Jun 19, 2016 10:19:01 GMT -5
That's a tricky question, since some of these pension-aged women might have just been married recently.
That being said, I will still say it's lower than 15.
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 20, 2016 11:11:56 GMT -5
As you were, and the number of women who said they still had a piece of their wedding cake is..:
15
*LOWER*
[3]
And so we come to your first shot at this game Bill, and we have:
A middle card, what's it to be?
|
|
|
|
Post by billmcdee on Jun 20, 2016 12:05:48 GMT -5
Let's change that card please, an 8 is as rotten as a 45 year old piece of wedding cake  |
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 20, 2016 14:07:30 GMT -5
And that 8 will become:  [Audience Groans] Well that's no better but you have no choice now. |
|
|
|
Post by billmcdee on Jun 20, 2016 14:55:08 GMT -5
Well not much better, I'll play the odds and say the next card will be higher.
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 21, 2016 5:22:00 GMT -5
Higher than a 7?..  [Further Oohs and Groans] And that definitely isn't better, what's it to be? |
|
|
|
Post by billmcdee on Jun 21, 2016 5:58:37 GMT -5
Freeze right there please.
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 22, 2016 14:05:55 GMT -5
[Resuming tomorrow!]
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 25, 2016 14:56:38 GMT -5
We seem to be getting all of the middle cards right now! We go to James for the 3rd question of this 2nd round:
We asked 100 men in Rome: Would you consider marrying a women only for her money? How many of those men said si?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2016 17:56:35 GMT -5
Whew! I think that's a pretty low number there. Marrying for money will not make you a bit happy. I would say 23
|
|
|
|
Post by billmcdee on Jun 26, 2016 6:28:17 GMT -5
I agree with James' reasoning and his number too, but I'll say even lower than 23, since Italian men seem to have a reputation for being romantic first and foremost, that's amore'.
|
|
|
|
Post by hodders on Jun 26, 2016 10:25:50 GMT -5
And the number of Roman Italian men who would marry a women purely for the contents of her bank account is:
23
*LOWER
*
[22]
Well how about that!? Just scraping it Bill, I imagine you want to change that 8?
|
|
|
|
Post by billmcdee on Jun 27, 2016 6:44:41 GMT -5
Indeed I do please.
|
|
